Tax Tips Blog

Answers to your Federal income tax questions
                     
                          TaxTipsBlog.com

Stimulus Rebate and Dependents

Print the article

This entry was posted on 3/18/2008 10:57 PM and is filed under uncategorized.

People claimed on another's return do not qualify for the Stimulus Rebate. When deciding if parents should claim their child for one last year, the Stimulus Rebate should be considered. There are no age limits on the Rebate that I am aware of. We often compare the total tax a family would pay two ways. With them claiming their child and without them claiming the child. This often occurs when children are of college age. The potential $600 that they could get, if they have enough income, should be considered when figuring who should claim the child, MAYBE.

Part of my uncertainty here is caused by what I call the 2008 Make Up filing. I expect that those who missed out on this May's payment will still have chance at getting it later. According to the IRS, "If you're not eligible this year but you become eligible next year, you can claim the economic stimulus payment next year on your 2008 tax return."

So, if a child aged 18 is claimed by their parents for 2007, can they next year when filing their 2008 return, in effect claim that they are entitled to their $600, because they actually claimed themselves on their 2008 return, the period to which the Stimulus Rebate is tied to? If this is allowed, the parents can benefit from claiming them for one more year, and they can get the rebate. This is different than the rule that says, dependents can't get the rebate. I am not offering an opinion about whether this will be possible? I am asking for my readers comments on it.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

    • 5/22/2008 3:21 PM BIGGUY wrote:
      To be eligible on the parents return the child must be under 17, so one turning 18 in 2008 and filing on their own in 2009 would not be double dipping because their parents did not receive anything for them in 2008.
      Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.